| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
3961. Why no support for solo PvE players? - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: Tyberius Franklin wrote: Pipa Porto wrote: Missions - Each LP or ISK you earn reduces the value of everyone else's LP/ISK - Only if the LP is used, there are those who have millions of LP for lack of knowing what to sp...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.15 01:54:00
|
3962. Why no support for solo PvE players? - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: Missions - Each LP or ISK you earn reduces the value of everyone else's LP/ISK - Only if the LP is used, there are those who have millions of LP for lack of knowing what to spend it on or just not wanting to which has no inf...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.15 01:23:00
|
3963. Lasers. Names. Changes. Please read before reaching for your weapons. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Liang Nuren wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: ... I understand why you're doing it, but I don't really like it. I preferred the Light/Heavy/etc nomenclature to Small/Med/... -Liang Agreed, I like my mega pulse lasers and mega blaster cannons. ...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.14 19:58:00
|
3964. Friday Special: Replace all NPC bounties with lootable tags - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Renan Ruivo wrote: Syler Puuntai wrote: Renan Ruivo wrote: Yes to replacing bounties with tags. No to NPC tag buy orders No to removing LP payouts from FW. This would actually help with the faction module/ship market. A lot. it depend...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.10 23:42:00
|
3965. For those who want to nerf PvE (Mission Running) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The reason I bring up concepts like that are the claims that missions are somehow a totally isolated activity that has no place in the sandbox (at least right up till a mission runner claims his gameplay doesn't affect anyone else. Suddenly then t...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.10 23:04:00
|
3966. For those who want to nerf PvE (Mission Running) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Muad 'dib wrote: My experience with agent running (right upto a max missions completion speed CNR) was that once i got there all i did was help others get there and chain missions after mission for isk i didnt really need. The epic arcs are go...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.10 22:41:00
|
3967. For those who want to nerf PvE (Mission Running) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Syler Puuntai wrote: Muad 'dib wrote: Okay a flat out limit on missions was way too harsh, what i mean to say is how about adding soming that gets them into probing plexing sometimes, or pvp or whatever really. Give qa huge bonus to the miss...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.10 22:31:00
|
3968. For those who want to nerf PvE (Mission Running) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Muad 'dib wrote: Mission runners tend to run missions to make isk to run missions better till they get ganked in their 15 bil golem and quit. Theres should be some direction for players to take that gently gets them into other aspects of eve, ...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.10 22:11:00
|
3969. Mining Barge "Game Balance" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: Believe me, I have very little faith in my ability to do math properly, I'm a much better artist. But yes, that's pretty much what I was getting at, the math -even my ****** math- says that the proc doesn't mine ice fast...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.10 16:41:00
|
3970. Mining Barge "Game Balance" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jorma Morkkis wrote: Natsett Amuinn wrote: It's just exhumer or barge. It's not T1 or T2 anymore. If exhumers aren't T2 ships anymore why you need Tech to build them? Why aren't BPOs seeded? Referring to tiers, not tech levels, or so I ...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.10 05:16:00
|
3971. Mining Barge "Game Balance" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: Mack gets 33%, so the Proc should only mine 33% faster over ONE laser than the Mack. It's not 66% faster than the Mack. With the same fittings, that isn't enough of an increase on a SINGLE laser, for it to mine more, fas...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.10 05:03:00
|
3972. Mining Barge "Game Balance" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: Cyn Durella wrote: The Mack has two harvesters and 2 Mining upgrades. The Procurer has one harvester and 2 mining upgrades. It also has the ice rig and 2 shield extender rigs. The Mack at this time still has the Cargo ...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.10 03:40:00
|
3973. Maelstrom Incursion fit - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Incursions call for an onmi damage buffer tank. 70% resists across the board. I'm not sure what the optimum setup is as I've never flown one for incursions.
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.10 02:19:00
|
3974. EVE UI is Presenting Information too Efficiently - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote: Elvis Fett wrote: Making the many mechanics of EVE easier to understand and making information more accessible does not equal 'dumbing down' the game. Making the game more accessible is a good thing as it ...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.09 19:42:00
|
3975. Back in my day...Vet Whine Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote: James 315 wrote: Taking hours to copy a bunch of bookmarks to be able to warp to stargates. That was a good thing. It gave travel risk and reward. Sounds more like lag inducing tedium if it could be by...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.09 19:40:00
|
3976. DEV RESPONCE REQUESTED: Amarr Rookie ships and cynos - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ps3ud0nym wrote: ITT: many people show they don't know how to read. DEV response requested. Not pubbie sperg wanted. You've already had a dev response linked
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.09 19:12:00
|
3977. Thank you, CCP! (New Retriever!) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A simple thank you is IMHO not a bad reason to make a thread to avoid it being buried amongst complaints and compensation requests.
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.08 21:40:00
|
3978. Re-Subbing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
MIrple wrote: Thanks Corina Jarr. I am really not trying to attack anyone on the forums. I am just trying to help people understand that EVE is PVP based once people come to this mind set there will be less err different complaints on the forum...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.08 19:45:00
|
3979. Barge Fairy Tale: CCP saving stupid Pigs from themselves. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Desturned wrote: Pipa Porto wrote: Shield Management 5, Tactical Shield Ops 4, Engineering 5, Electronics 5, Exhumers 5, Shield Upgrades 1, Energy Management 5, Hull Upgrades 1, Shield Rigging 1 to be fair this tank requires shie...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.07 22:31:00
|
3980. Barge Fairy Tale: CCP saving stupid Pigs from themselves. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Tyberius Franklin wrote: Since the consequence is a gank, that would make gankers responsible for ganking. Others just aid in target selection. Doesnt matter how you try to word it, the problem for the miner always starts w...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2012.08.07 22:20:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |